No. 23-6447
Samuel Sherman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause confrontation-right criminal-joinder criminal-procedure prejudice prejudicial-error rule-14 rule-14-procedure sixth-amendment zafiro-precedent zafiro-v-united-states
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the lower courts misapplie d this Court's holding in Zafiro
v. Unit ed States, 506 U.S. 534, 113 S.Ct. 933 (1993), and the
require ments of Rule 14, F.R.Crim .P. in a way that prejudicially violated
Sherman's Sixth Amendm ent right of confrontation.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower courts misapplied this Court's holding in Zafiro v. United States
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 9, 2024)
Attorneys
Samuel Sherman
Jeffrey Marx Rosenzweig — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent