Whether the U.S.S.G Commentary being issued on a High in § 2L1.1 is unconstitutionally vague when it was never subjected to notice and comment to the public, and precedent defines vagueness as a statute that fails to give ordinary people fair notice.

Whether the Commentary cannot expand the definition of "minor" broader than the federal definition set by this Court in United States v Esquivel-Quintana, 137 S. Ct.

Can the U.S.S.G. commentary definition of a 'minor' in § 2L1.1 commentary note 1 be considered unconstitutionally vague when it was never subjected to notice and comment to the public, and precedent defines vagueness as a statute that fails to give ordinary people fair notice