No. 23-644
City of Charlotte, North Carolina, et al. v. Azucena Zamorano Aleman, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Rubin Galindo Chavez
Amici (1)
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-rights constitutional-rights deadly-force fourth-amendment law-enforcement precedent qualified-immunity use-of-force
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in the process it used to find a "clearly established" Fourth Amendment right because it used cases: (1) decided after the shooting; (2) where no violation was found; and (3) that involved different facts.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in the process it used to find a 'clearly established' Fourth Amendment right
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-14
Reply of petitioners City of Charlotte, North Carolina, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2024-01-31
Brief of respondent Azucena Zamorano Aleman in opposition filed.
2024-01-16
Brief amicus curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association filed.
2023-12-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 31, 2024.
2023-12-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 16, 2024 to January 31, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-12-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2024)
Attorneys
Azucena Zamorano Aleman
Stephen Luke Largess — Tin, Fulton, Walker & Owen, Respondent
City of Charlotte, et al.
Steven Andrew Bader — Cranfill Sumner , Petitioner
International Municipal Lawyers Association
Patrick Michael Kane — Fox Rothschild LLP, Amicus