No. 23-6438
Jean Jocelyn Merilien v. Andrew McFarlane, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process exculpatory-evidence exhaustion habeas-corpus prosecutorial-misconduct standing trial-disclosure
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in concluding that Petitioner's Rule 60(b)(6) motion did not satisfy the requirements for relief under that rule
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-01-24
Waiver of right of respondent Andrew Warden, McFarlane to respond filed.
2023-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Andrew Warden, McFarlane
Stephen John Petrany — Georgia Department of Law, Respondent
Jean Merilien
Jean J. Merilien — Petitioner