No. 23-6426
Leonard Nyamusevya v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: bankruptcy civil-procedure constitutional-violation discharged-debt due-process judicial-report mortgage-foreclosure property-taking public-interest statutory-interpretation takings
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Takings Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FourthAmendment Takings Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-05-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
i) In violation of § 524(a) and § 1326(c) and Rule 9011 and O.R.C. § 2329, whether a Supplemental Final Judicial Report violates the Ohio and U.S. Constitutions and the 5th and 8th and 14th Amendments for allowing a per se taking of a home? Isn't the public interest affected?
ii) Isn't left for this Court to block a Supplemental Final Judicial Report that allowed a per se taking of a home and that allowed a conflicting decision with other Courts ' decisions on the same issues of § 524(a) and to enforce void judgments to collect discharged personal debts? Isn't a per se taking?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-a-supplemental-final-judicial-report-violates-the-ohio-and-u.s.-constitutions
Docket Entries
2024-05-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-03-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent CitiMortgage, Inc. to respond filed.
2023-12-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2024)
Attorneys
CitiMortgage Inc.
Leonard Nyamusevya — Petitioner
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Kara Ann Czanik — Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP, Respondent