No. 23-642
Kevin Scott Karsjens, et al. v. Jodi Harpstead, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process federal-courts implied-waiver legal-standard professional-judgment waiver
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether federal courts have a duty to apply the correct legal standard to a due process claim or can the court apply the wrong legal standard based on an implied waiver?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal courts have a duty to apply the correct legal standard to a due process claim or can the court apply the wrong legal standard based on an implied waiver?
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent Jodi Harpstead, et al. to respond filed.
2023-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2024)
Attorneys
Jodi Harpstead, et al.
Aaron E. Winter — Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Respondent
Kevin Karsjens, et al.
Daniel E. Gustafson — Gustafson Gluek, PLLC, Petitioner