No. 23-6409
Alfred E. Caraffa v. Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Latest Conference:
2024-05-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's decision in this case conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Hernandez v. Mesa?
Docket Entries
2024-05-20
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2024-04-30
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-04-06
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2024-03-04
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-05
Waiver of right of federal respondent to respond filed.
2023-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 5, 2024)
Attorneys
Alfred E. Caraffa
Alfred Erik Caraffa — Petitioner
AZ DOC, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent