No. 23-6400
Michael Hewitt v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should the trial court have acquitted Petitioner of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine where (1) the evidence at best showed a conspiracy to distribute MDMA (ecstasy); (2) the jury expressly acquitted Petitioner of conspiracy to distribute MDMA (ecstasy); (3) there was no evidence of any meeting of the minds about distributing any drug other than MDMA (ecstasy); and (4) the evidence showed that the pills the alleged conspirators (and the police) believed were MDMA (ecstasy) were actually methamphetamine?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the trial court have acquitted Petitioner of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 1, 2024)
Attorneys
Michael Hewitt
Tina Schneider — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent