No. 23-6398

Imre Kifor v. Massachusetts, et al.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: child-custody civil-rights constitutional-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection executive-order federal-funding separation-of-powers sovereign-immunity
Latest Conference: 2024-02-23
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) The "Sec. 8. Affirmatively Advancing Civil Rights ... to prevent and address discrimination and advance equity for all" clause of the 2/16/2023 Presidential Executive Order 1 results in the predictable "equity for the rich or equity for the poor mother? " dilemma as "equity for all" is impossible by Marxist design. Is the mandate to selectively "advance equity " (for a select few) Constitutional?

2) Does sovereign immunity apply to an "LGBTQ+ " Massachusetts when using federal funds to subsidize the forceful separation and activist-agenda-driven alienation of innocent American children from their loving American parents?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the mandate to selectively 'advance equity' (for a select few) Constitutional?

Docket Entries

2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-01-09
Waiver of right of respondents Massachusetts, et al. to respond filed.
2023-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 29, 2024)

Attorneys

Imre Kifor
Imre Kifor — Petitioner
Massachusetts
Katherine Brady DirksOffice of the Attorney General of Massachusetts, Respondent