Imre Kifor v. Massachusetts, et al.
1) The "Sec. 8. Affirmatively Advancing Civil Rights ... to prevent and address discrimination and advance equity for all" clause of the 2/16/2023 Presidential Executive Order 1 results in the predictable "equity for the rich or equity for the poor mother? " dilemma as "equity for all" is impossible by Marxist design. Is the mandate to selectively "advance equity " (for a select few) Constitutional?
2) Does sovereign immunity apply to an "LGBTQ+ " Massachusetts when using federal funds to subsidize the forceful separation and activist-agenda-driven alienation of innocent American children from their loving American parents?
Is the mandate to selectively 'advance equity' (for a select few) Constitutional?