1. Does the Common-Law exception recognized in State ex rel. Richards v. Foust
- that doesn't require a response from a Records Custodian to a public records request -
abridge the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of a litigant?
A. Does Due Process require a Court to conduct an In Camera review of requested
records.
2. Does the Wisconsin Supreme Court's decision in State ex rel. Richards v. Foust
conflict with this Court's decision in Missouri v. Frye, that held formal plea offers and
negotiations must be made part of the record?
A. Does a prosecutor waive their qualified privilege derived from the attorney work-
product doctrine if both parties concede a final plea offer was made?

Does the Common-Law exception recognized in State ex rel. Richards v. Foust abridge the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of a litigant?