Whether CAFC made an error in their decision to dismiss CAFC 2023-1678 (DC-
3443-18-0288-1-1) which was about DIA's Admin Judge 's Failure to Postpone Clearance
Hearing Long Enough For Me To Get A Lawyer, And DIA's Admin Judge 's Failure To
Consider My Legitimate Discrimination and Retaliation Concerns in the Clearance
Revocation Hearing, And whether Employer Discrimination is going to be allowed to
flourish in the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and
the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). And whether CAFC Violated Constitutional Law
when they failed to address the discrimination by MDA and DIA.

Whether anyone or any organization can deny access to EEO records in a
Discrimination Case, Complaint or Appeal. And whether MDA can intentionally withhold
vital evidence they have in their possession that would change the outcome of the CAFC
decision, such as the H: harddrive containing dates, times, and people for numerous
instances of disparate treatment, discrimination and retaliation, the EEO records of the
discriminators and the EEO records of the discriminating organization, and The FBI
investigation that cleared Mr. Adams of any wrongdoing.

Whether CAFC can deny an Oral Argument Request for a case of this magnitude and
have justice prevail. And whether Mr. Adams ' Sixth Amendment Rights were violated
when CAFC disregarded/ignored his request for an oral argument, in effect, denying him
of his right to be heard, and denying him of his right to face his accuser.

Whether CAFC made an error in their decision to dismiss CAFC 2023-1678