Mahfooz Ahmad v. Colin Day, et al.
1. What does 28 U.S. Code § 2284 mandate regarding the composition of a district court when an action challenges the constitutionality of a federal law?
2. Whether the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925, as outlined in 9 U.S.C. § 2.3.4, violates the constitutional protections established in the Seventh and Ninth Amendments of the United States Bill of Rights, particularly in civil rights cases.
a. Whether this Court, in its capacity as the Supreme Court of the land, should redefine the contours of the Federal Arbitration Law to confine its immediate applicability to corporate-to-corporate arbitration.
b. Whether, in light of corporate entities deliberately misusing the 'intent' and 'purpose' underpinning the Federal Arbitration Act, this Court must categorically prohibit its invocation in the context of employment and consumer proceedings.
What does 28 U.S. Code § 2284 mandate regarding the composition of a district court when an action challenges the constitutionality of a federal law?