Am. the orders tram He Court of dypeats vah'ol absent
wthori-zedsiqnatvpe, of a. \udlcial officer ?I. an
■? - ~z_ 'V7*** " •
f of dppeats opinion
Newlln U Jie/ffMj /23 F. 3d d3Y Cy^C/c 1937^ ccntnzry to
law of 28 US.C Sec. /9/S f
3, Did X fall H idenHfp cl good fai/t
memorandum in sopporf of motton jar JeaUe. tz> proceed cm
appeal l/t forma paepeds f
9. Did He. District Courf wllk deJltemte. /Udlfference-
confrary to its ou/n tdd//gs disallow me a/t oyportudfy to
compta/hfT2. Ts He Seven/h Clrcolf C /n cor,
Issue. In my
(meAcl mp
ft'/acj fo Jar an yyo&a/ t>e. cJiWZied 5. How can one
that \aMS neUeT f//ed fa.
G, Wlah Is the. f/ttng fee, for If
2. Wi/I He Cupreme. Court If X cm denied tenure M
forma pauperis on certiorari and can not pay Me fd/dj
fee* order me. to pay if anyway after cerf/omri Is
denied W/tA He same opinion of 2g USX. fee.
19/5 as Me yHCtr. Interprets /f wiM Atew/d i/,
HeJmany /23 S3d V29 t/^Ctr /9?7j Pfded?/was no aypea

Are the orders from the Court of Appeals valid absent an authorized signature of a judicial officer?