No. 23-6323
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process identification-evidence mandatory-minimum parole photo-array plea-bargaining sentencing witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Does (x. \t\&\ CUjurV c\. c*\<nvrwOi &&£erAdn\r cP di/ve. process ujWexA (\tde^Mf\c^ (x. o^aAVm pk^ u)^<mV v^ftAin^ -\h(y*\ dootxV (k. vmc,d{*Wu ■VeT'c^ c£ psraW_ as a, feqyi ceA p?*rV o£ oj\ ?s\V\o.c\caA 6cf^&r\CjL.\
A, 'Oxks CM^&OAch'Je-' Ac^\C£-^ \j\(x, p^bUsheJ. ieao^ c$ Ctif\zej3\wey\csL- su$\oz> process \c^ochyA^ (k rnotn
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a criminal court deprive a defendant of due process by accepting a guilty plea without informing them about a mandatory term of parole as a required part of an enhanced sentence?
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2024)
Attorneys
Ryan F. Duncan
Ryan F. Duncan — Petitioner