No. 23-6321
Barbara Johnson-Luster v. Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary of the Army
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-rights court-appointed-counsel disability-rights due-process equal-protection exceptional-circumstances title-vii
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Takings EmploymentDiscrimina
SocialSecurity DueProcess Takings EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether an appellant in the Circuit Courts, with an invisible disability and previous court appointed attorneys in the Lower District Courts should receive a court appointed attorney for their Title VII appeal under the equal protection clause, when exceptional circumstances remain unchanged from the District Courts orders?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an appellant in the Circuit Courts, with an invisible disability and previous court appointed attorneys in the Lower District Courts should receive a court appointed attorney for their Title VII appeal under the equal protection clause, when exceptional circumstances remain unchanged from the District Courts orders?
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-22
Waiver of right of respondent Wormuth, Christine to respond filed.
2023-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2024)
Attorneys
Barbara Johnson-Luster
Wormuth, Christine
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent