1.) There are 330 million Americans and almost all of them either have or will
choose who to pursue for potential marriage, children, and family, which are
constitutionally protected rights. Should the choice of a woman and a man —
both adults — to pursue one another in a relationship that could potentially
lead to marriage, children, and family — a choice "deeply rooted in our ... ■
Nation's history and tradition" and "in the concept of ordered liberty," be
such a right, protected by the Due Process Clause and/or the Privileges or
Immunities Clause of the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment?

2.) Should the state have the right to arbitrarily and unequally criminalize
Constitutionally protected rights between consenting adults based solely on
an occupation when many, if not all, occupations have "similarly situated"
relationships?

3.) Should we eliminate substantive due process doctrine from our jurisprudence
overturning all of it's erroneous precedents?

4.) Does the Privileges or Immunities Clause protect any rights that are not
enumerated in the Constitution and, if so, should we use the "Glucksberg
test" to identify those rights?

Should the choice of a woman and a man to pursue a relationship that could lead to marriage, children, and family be a constitutionally protected right?