No. 23-6308
Ariel Garcia-Pelico v. Nebraska
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel investigative-procedures judicial-discretion motion-to-reopen procedural-fairness sixth-amendment strickland-v-washington
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. x tOeutb L\Wc Tb (Rented. or. nIot ^\al Onset's Actu^s f&L 'Betbuo Thl DA v. 0& n!i<- ?
2. X wool5 U\ce 1o f4/^ kftterH6t o/i Mot CouzJSaA Actions ftuL £euW "foe Sn&ciuA»Jb */• W^srtuJQW SmrtOAfc&s?
3. Mi/ ITR^At FtWo£ "life 3v Vv1a5 1A€ i)^e' 4 Actios ^DSgOoT '0^/ M Alu>UJi^6 lb Rc - Ofert
4. lAlAs H^/lfviezb^W ft&vrs \fioMre£> Wrt&4 Cou^T AsKeb ^itvivjesTwH atit/6 fifoes-notf1£ "ft feosexmoN *
5. Dib Mu Twau/Affaire CbutfSec's Aq-ioj43 Fall . Beto*> Th< Gi(B.Soi4 3'A»JC5APl>2?fisnet v.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Were the trial counsel's actions below the Strickland v. Washington standards?
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2024)
Attorneys
Ariel Garcia-Pelico
Ariel Garcia-Pelico — Petitioner