No. 23-6307
Veronica McCluskey v. William Hendricks, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure cross-examination due-process fair-hearing jury-trial legal-conduct reversible-error standing trial-court witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. The Court Should Grant Review To Clarify Whether The Trial Court Committed Reversible Error In Not Granting Respondent A Jury Trial In The First Instance.
2. Whether Petitioner's Due Process Rights Were Violated When The Trial Court Prevented Petitioner From A Fair Hearing In Limiting Cross-Examination Of William Hendricks Illegal Conduct.
3. An Important Question Exists Whether Petitioner's Due Process Rights Were Violated When The Trial Court Limited Cross Examination Of William Hendricks.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-trial-court-committed-reversible-error-in-not-granting-respondent-a-jury-trial
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-02
Waiver of right of respondent William Hendricks and Roxanne Hendricks to respond filed.
2023-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2024)
Attorneys
Veronica McCluskey
Veronica McCluskey — Petitioner
William Hendricks and Roxanne Hendricks
Kathrin A. Wanner — Miller I Wanner LLP, Respondent