Chet Smith v. Cook County, Illinois
_YV\e re^urfi of a<\ \ ndi'cFrnecvV | w i-hhou-b c\
Whefhec ids -deems do
bill, \/ioU-Ves dhe Fi^-^rb
cjCani dur^ of
inoA Procedure,\, VJheFVieC
VO-Vc ^ u?or\
Ov do nod Cons-Vidude a druo /
/bv\e<\d<neM Oju<*r-apifee of ird icAmoAd
RuVes L> o,c\<\ 1 of dWe Fed er u\ (bdeS of Cr;
(^r^d S^o^VLor oU\ p^neV
defended held -do answer upoo <x v/oic*a
t <vu
3, vJfefher a
SWVd be awarded &ny f e be-P ; upon
oiadvon where dbe void ComplcSndtelo un| Compl
Vvs -VlcneVy prednod
product of dhe Grove c n roe Ad'S p^ddem
dh dhe express Cecjui reooeaF • O fCXv A-V
\ $ dhe
f\or\ - Comp Viuacc w»
1diA,\c 3 of -fhe Federa\ Pm\cs of C.r\wined Procedure
fAade upon oadh before, ex -Vhad cx Cocv\plav,A-h be
Cow^i S5 \of\er or offer officer empowered do Cr/*i/?d
person eharejed wlfh an offenses.
whether-the-return-of-an-indictment-without-a-vote-by-the-grand-jury-violates-the-fifth-amendment-guarantee-of-indictment-by-a-grand-jury