1. Is the original scope and purpose of a section 1983 action is to allow black
citizens the right to sue racist government where it has been infiltrated by the Ku
KluxKlan?

2. Is judicial immunity included in the original language of section 1983 drafting or
its legislative history?

3. Mr. Gooden do move this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2403(a) to call
into question the unconstitutional judicial amendment to section 1983 statute
regarding governmental immunities. Is jurisdiction proper in the United States
Supreme Court?

4. Do the immunity laws illegally injected into section 1983 actions designed to
protect government officials, act to interfere with a citizens First Amendment
right to petition the government for a redress of grievances?

5. Can common-law judicial immunity, which is a product of legislation from the
bench, be applied to section 1983 statute without appropriate statutory
amendment?

6. Is the slow erosion of the constitution and the people's rights an Obvious
indication of the stealthy infiltration into government by the Ku Klux Klan to
eventually "overthrow the reconstruction laws and the people and state
government they were designed to protect"?

7. Is common-law judicial immunity injected into section 1983 statutory
application the creation of Judicial Activism?

Is the original scope and purpose of a section 1983 action to allow black citizens the right to sue racist government where it has been infiltrated by the Ku Klux Klan?