Is the AEDPA's one-year limitation period for state prisoners to raise claims of ineffective assistance of counsel triggered by conclusion of "direct appeal-equivalent" initial-review collateral proceedings described in Martinez v. Ryan in favor of conclusion of direct appeal proceedings in which review of such claims is barred by the State?

Is the AEDPA's one-year limitation period for state prisoners to raise claims of ineffective assistance of counsel triggered by conclusion of 'direct appeal-equivalent' initial-review collateral proceedings described in Martinez v. Ryan in favor of conclusion of direct appeal proceedings in which review of such claims is barred by the State?