No. 23-6230
Danille Morris v. United States
Tags: attorney-client-confidentiality attorney-client-privilege guilty-plea habeas-corpus habeas-relief plea-bargaining prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment tollett-interpretation tollett-v-henderson
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
When a defendant pleads guilty, does Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258 (1973), preclude the defendant from collaterally attacking the sentence because of surreptitious prosecutorial misconduct into confidential attorney-client communications that predated the guilty plea?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Tollett v. Henderson preclude collateral attack on a sentence due to pre-plea prosecutorial misconduct involving confidential attorney-client communications?
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-26
Reply of petitioner Danille Morris filed. (Distributed)
2024-03-13
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-02-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 13, 2024.
2024-02-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 12, 2024 to March 13, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-01-11
Response Requested. (Due February 12, 2024)
2024-01-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2023-12-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-12-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 11, 2024)
Attorneys
Danille Morris
Daniel Tyler Hansmeier — Kansas Federal Public Defender's Office , Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent