He * i/-e pr& (oa b r it h y Lj //. f/)c,r-Lj hand 1 evidence"0<ZS re a. <S on a es fa hi is fed in for#. d, " dear and under cj°35 fan dar dt Confihcf F>i fh He Criteria ,convinc/n p ■er dePi ne d t/. jA/farfe j(j } initial/tj /m-ee fs the thiah V.S.cL . fzz '4f (*>),Once a p<etih'oner regard incj a 2 8 a.pp he# hi on ? the Jcnial oP aSecoNb Quesr/o/j : o ej labi/tfcj apph'eaiion 28 U.S-t. § 225 3 C c)j con LPi ttn the clear and Convincing 'evidence standard } fhai aJas me i hej gatekeepers ?Certificate of A p a rSu an / 7h>p p eaf !iet~ pe hi hi one r threug h

Does the 'reasonable probability' standard, established in Brady v. Maryland, conflict with the 'clear and convincing evidence' criteria, defined under Sawyer v. Whitley, once a petitioner initially meets the high bar regarding a 28 U.S.C. §2244(b) application?