1. Did the NHSC apply Rule 20(2) unconstitutionally and violate Father's due process rights to a meaningful appeal?

2. Did the NHSC violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or the Equal Protection clause of the Fifth Amendment, in failing to perform a de novo review of his case or in failing to follow its own precedents and in requiring Father to go above and beyond New Hampshire law and precedent to prove his case?

3. Did the NHSC error in failing to apply any procedural burden shifting requirements of RSA 170-C:5, I to the Mother?

4. Did the NHSC error in failing to determine whether Mother was "financially able" to do more than she did?

5. Did the NHSC rewrite its own stare decisis on the meaning of "nominal" child support?

6. Did the NHSC error in applying a Family Division admissions rule to Probate proceedings under RSA 170-C:3?

7. Did the NHSC violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or the Equal Protection clause of the Fifth Amendment, in not allowing the Father to challenge Judicially Noticed facts entered after the trial had been completed?

8. Did the NHSC error in not following its own stare decisis regarding the issues of abandonment, neglect, admissions and judicial notice?

Did the NHSC apply Rule 20(2) unconstitutionally and violate Father's due-process rights-to-a-meaningful-appeal?