No. 23-6208
Pleadro J. Scott v. Miami Dade County, Florida, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: advocacy appellate-process appellate-review case-law civil-procedure court-procedure discretion due-process incomplete-record judicial-review legal-interpretation statutory-construction
Latest Conference:
2024-05-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
L. XT A b£- bJT-M- &F £>u£- ^/2-cC^iir F<&R. A n^xspT
fiPP&ALs T-o FATL Tz, rprfcB cnteTcZ^At aj<*7Z^£: gF Ab^bX^-AZTSSF
fac^s at uF<n~^> &y a pn-Fry f Tj^sozu <\
jv£>6.m£ft' QAsBLb vp>o a/ /w <&sc.& «-wa
FAxim^ TO FpPLy tthF Zyfw rz> -r?r£ F=A<or^ otJ
OF TTt£ FJtns&b
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in failing to exercise its discretion to consider additional advocacy from a party, where the judgment was based on an incomplete record and failed to apply the law to the facts on each of the issues presented
Docket Entries
2024-05-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-03-13
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-11-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Pleadro J. Scott
Pleadro J. Scott — Petitioner