Whether the Tenth Circuit contravened this Court's precedents in ruling that Petitioner was not denied due process of law — based on ex post facto principles — when he was convicted for a fatal shooting that the federal jury unanimously found occurred in self-defense as defined by the Oklahoma law that governed his conduct at the time and place, before this Court announced its McGirt decision?

Whether the Tenth Circuit contravened this Court's precedents in ruling that Petitioner was not denied due process of law — based on ex post facto principles — when he was convicted for a fatal shooting that the federal jury unanimously found occurred in self-defense as defined by the Oklahoma law that governed his conduct at the time and place, before this Court announced its McGirt decision?