No. 23-6204

Angel Anthony Sanchez v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-12-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel evidence-code fair-trial fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment prior-acts-instructions sixth-amendment trial-procedure
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether petitioner was denied his Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process and fair trial because of the court's use of prior acts instructions CALCRIM 375 and 1109(a).

Whether petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights.

Review is necessary to determine violations of my Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

The court abused its discretion by admitting Jane Doe 2's testimony pursuant to Evidence Code Section 1101 and/or 1108.

Reversal of courts 1, 2, and 3 is required because the court's prior acts instructions CALCRIM 375 1109(a) deprived appellant of due process and a fair trial.

Appellant's $5,000 restitution/parole revocation fine violates my state and federal constitutional rights to due process, equal protection, and to be free from excessive fines.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-petitioner-was-denied-his-fifth-sixth-and-fourteenth-amendment-rights-to-due-process-and-fair-trial

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 8, 2024)

Attorneys

Angel Anthony Sanchez
Angel Anthony Sanchez — Petitioner