Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the ineligibility provision of 18 USC §3632(d)(4)(D) First Step Act Time Credits constitutional?
II. Can the Federal Bureau of Prisons determine First Step Act Time Credit eligibility through administrative aggregation under 18 USC §3584(c)? The imposition of sentences is a function of the judicial process. The question of substance here, presents significant importance in federal law and the need to resolve the needless conflict among Circuit Courts on the issue of administrative aggregation by the Federal Bureau of Prisons' treatment of charge allocation being equally and fully allocable to each constituent offense.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the ineligibility provision of 18 USC §3632(d)(4)(D) constitutional?
2024-02-20
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner GRANTED. The order entered January 8, 2024, is vacated.
2024-02-08
Application (23A703) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 15, 2024.
2024-01-26
Application (23A703) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of January 8, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.
2024-01-24
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-17
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2024-01-08
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 29, 2024, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent Warden, Allenwood FCI Low to respond filed.
2023-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 8, 2024)