No. 23-6191

In Re Colby Jerome Hale

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-12-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure consent consent-search constitutional-jurisdiction district-court due-process federal-procedure magistrate notification peace-officer standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)

8) What is the purpose of Rule 18 of the Supreme Court of the United States on an Appeal from the U.S. District Court. If you do exactly what the rule requires and this is still sent to the U.S. Court of Appeals to be taken?

a) Is file a Non-Consent?

2) If a thing referred to Magistrate is if still in the courts discretion to hear?

3) If petitioner's case does not make it pass a magistrate's recommendations on a Fed. R. Civ. P. is Rule 5 You & have to notify the party's, they have never been notified at all?

4) Is there a Remedy if the U.S. Court Check never notified the petitioner of his right to not consent to magistrate in a Civil matter?

5) Can the Local rule of the United States District Court of Colorado, violate the established rules of the highest court of the State?

6) Can the U.S. District Court forfeit its jurisdiction by wilfully not answering Constitutional Challenge to a Statute, pursuant to Fed. Civ. P. Rule 5.4?

7) Are the Colorado Revised Statutes, 18-3-201 and 16-2.5-101, Vague by one Statute 18-3-204 referring to said section 16-2.5-101, C.R.S., to make ambulance attendant or operators, paramedics, doctors, Nurses and Firefighters "Peace Officers"?

8) When you look at section 16-2.5-104, C.R.S., and go through article 25, and can't find a doctor, nurse, ambulance attendant or operator, paramedics, and Firefighter listed as a Peace Officer, does Statute 18-3-204 not reach its overbreadth?

9) According to these two statutes 18-3-204, C.R.S. and 16-2.5-101, C.R.S., it gives doctors, nurses, firefighters the right to detain someone under Reasonable suspicion, YES or NO?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

What is the purpose of Rule 18 of the Supreme Court of the United States on an appeal from the U.S. District Court

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-11-22
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 8, 2024)

Attorneys

Colby J. Hale
Colby Jerome Hale — Petitioner