(1) Whether the trial Court erred in amending Judgment and hate Sentencing to not* dual in violation of fllx, ft-Crim. P, Rule ti&lH,i (h)

(d) Whether trial Court erred in using a Joo? bur^L&nj Violent. Crime &r 1/1*.lent HokM,'nd'cfM tnt Chotrce in violation df a Mississippi Supreme. Court ruling in V State Ss - 3d 1687 (Do /<$)

(3) Whether tno I Court violated Mermans Constitutional Ulcjtjf to Q pastand Upeedtj trial,

(dJ [nhtiher tfre State &rd trial Court Committed &l<jl*d> Sr&dtj Clod)] Judicial ^ Juror b*as p Pm&cctttorlal dls a Srooon Error, land vet, fad Peter/mns rldht to

(5) Whether Counsel U>a$ ine4Pech ✓£ in \liolaficn oromc ffi? FJAJidi Ccq/6 11Q y CronlC quu LtS IQt SPt Pd3% do C£d dd IqS? (l^t)j^ Strickland Y lOQShncjfeo ^ Us U*. to UdSd h71 IdHSti. A)5JQ?ftX

(p) bofiether Petermans C&nstltuflorftf tufhtfo Crass Z/k3mlnt OoltnesSes pjqs Violated,

Whether the trial court erred in amending the indictment, affecting trial and sentencing