Are Arizona. Judiciaries violating 4be Doe. Process Clause <dr 4be Arizona. and Un;4ed States ConoViVuWm / bu, practicing a Professional fJocm AWsA is contrary -Vo Arizona. lata?

1. tsthe ArtzonadudiciarLy permissivelij aiW»irv^ and. pcsftic.1pollnc^ in an crw^cirn^ Professional A/orm desianed 4e> cfentj criminal deferdorts afair-Vrial ?

CocrVCTrial Coec^N provided a- Did tbe Coconino County Superior ftae-fecum j bt^uibidn j4o administer^ S4rodtoml Error ' ?

ll ls4be Association facVor i'lCoold CucoViveladttJcVicns have remedied 4V>eent- dr AVie verdi cV? acorn pon i odicialprej Wicm scPriered ?

b -Did4t\e Arizona Court- dr Appeals provide a continual method 4re» romcte. ^Structural Error 1?

P e. 0idJbeAtizoaa Supreme Court provide the means Vo pramoVe ^Structural Error *?

2. Did -the Prosecution and.Trial Court continually place in jecpordaWse -fendornental frametoork. dr FoWansbees criminal-trial j resulting in "Structural Error ?

3.Should all criminal defendantsV'rcmdbe period dr December I j 2CCSS To Aanuai'u l j 2010 be a ranted 'Retrocxcti ve Status*4-ortbe Arizona Supreme Courts fta;\ore_4o provide relief-from cun error cPite oton makma*?f

Are Arizona judiciaries violating the Due Process Clause of the Arizona and United States Constitutions, by practicing a Professional Norm that is contrary to Arizona law?