Question I - Was there adequate consideration at sentencing of Moore's mental illness such as to make his sentence procedurally and substantively erroneous and greater than necessary?

Question II- Was Mr. Moore's sentence procedurally and substantively unreasonable due to an erroneous fact finding that Moore intended to shoot Mr. Versi, and penalizing him with a life sentence for it, while Moore said it was an accident? Should the District Court have considered a lesser sentencing for second degree murder where it did not do so.

Question III- Was the plea of guilty insufficient as venue was not sufficiently established as to show that Moore committed any crimes in the Western District of Tennessee where only the Indictment states each count occurred in the Western District of Tennessee, PageID 5, but that was not admitted nor established in the plea Colloquy?

Question IV – Shouldn't the sentences given Moore have been run concurrently rather than consecutively such that it was procedurally unreasonable to run them all consecutively.

Adequacy-of-sentencing-consideration-for-mental-illness