No. 23-6152
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: arbitration civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-review preemption statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference:
2024-01-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal courts have jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of the Federal Arbitration Act's application to state-law claims in state court proceedings
Docket Entries
2024-01-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2024-01-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2023-12-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-11-10
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 2, 2024)
Attorneys
Michael Alonzo Rufus
Michael Alonza Rufus — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent