No. 23-6123
Kyle Maurice Parks v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: camera constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence law-enforcement perjury search-and-seizure suppression-hearing vehicle
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
0) UrevldiNO. W A tfehihc, Coma,,-,
r£-/U/ 4^t/ yu°r ViokrtCM) a pthu ®(ficen pi
pttj vny <U ThZ fiu-T AT JUpfiHeSJ/o*
&c;e faoccs.3
0) A / Q/LE-S£A>7 C?/jf £>£ MU /AJ
0/4-TC 6^- i^6cp/e»« —2s lVUOCo
/4-T7 o^ 1*0 & CA/( lAA)C£ Ar^cJ MoT lA°s. s
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a court allow the prosecution to present evidence of a defendant's vehicle, camera, or perjury for the purpose of a suppression hearing and violate due process?
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2023)
Attorneys
Kyle M. Parks
Kyle Maurice Parks — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent