No. 23-6114

Andre Jackson v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-11-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-rights court-opinion due-process evidentiary-issues ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-procedure legal-issue legal-relief procedural-error record-development
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether Appellant's cause vs performance was clearly erroneous.

2. Whether the issue of insufficient evidence was a significant, obvious and clearly plainly stronger issue than those presented on appeal.

3. Whether substantial newly developed or the issue of insufficient evidence issue preserved for appeal prejudice test satisfied by appellate counsel for the cause and whether per absence.

4. Whether a knowledgeable relief due to appellate counsel's deficient performance.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether APPELLATE Counsel's PERFORMANCE WAS deFiciut uNneteR StrickiANnd

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2023)

Attorneys

Andre Jackson
Andre Jackson — Petitioner