No. 23-6112
Derek Paul Smyer v. Bryan D. Phillips, Acting Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law appellate-review certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus judicial-discretion ninth-circuit standing third-party-culpability
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. WHETHER THE UNITED STATES NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT FAILED OR REFUSED TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (COA) ON ONE OR MORE OF PETITIONER'S CLAIMS FOR RELIEF; AND IF SO, WHETHER THIS COURT SHOULD ISSUE A COA ON ONE OR MORE OF PETITIONER'S CLAIMS FOR RELIEF?
II. WHETHER OR NOT REASONABLE JURISTS COULD DIFFER AS TO THE QUESTION OF WHETHER THE U.S. DISTRICT CORRECTLY DETERMINED THAT THE STATE TRIAL COURT'S EXCLUSION OF THIRD-PARTY CULPABILI
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it failed or refused to apply the correct legal standard in evaluating the plaintiffs' claims
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent Bryan D. Phillips to respond filed.
2023-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2023)
Attorneys
Bryan D. Phillips
Kenneth Charles Byrne — California Attorney General, Respondent
Derek Paul Smyer
Derek Paul Smyer — Petitioner