Can Constitutional deprivations be justified by some remote administrative benefit to the State such as an Administrative Plan ?

Can local practice, such as an Administrative Plan pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Administrative Order #14. be allowed to defeat or put of unreasonable obstacles in the way of a plain and reasonable assertion of Federal rights?

Can the power of decision vested in the trial court be delegated to investigators, other subordinate officials, attaches of the court, or anyone not authorized to act on behalf of the judicial branch of the State government?

Can Constitutional depravations be justified by some remote administrative benefit to the State such as an Administrative Plan?