1. The question is whether a .State or US Court of Appeals abused
its discretion and/or committed plain error for a misapplication
of state law (statute); and/or whether the State or US Court of
Appeals has decided an important question of federal law that
has not been but should be settled by this Court?

2. The question is whether petitioner has an entitled liberty
interest in his release to a mandated statute release/ whether
the statute at issue"-.! . e. 508.145(d) as petitioner reads it/
a contract on how petitioner is to earn his eligibility for
release on parole/ more importantly/ whether that release to
parole is governed by the statute alone or a parole panel
review process that petitioner is mandated not to be considered
for?

3. The question is whether Texas violates petitioner's Un
constitutional Right to Due Process of Law by NOT''.honoring
trial court's judge and petitioner plea agreement/ [which]
is governed under 503.145(d)?

4. The question is whether ^exas law and TDCJ Rules LANGUAGE
is plain and clear to the fact'that petitioner must do ONE-
Half of his sentence in order for his eligibility to parole
constitute an liberty interest/ Dr does the Court's interpre
tation adequately follows the laws/ statutes/ and mpCJ rules
where as (BPP) "overreach" of authority to deny parole when
there is no other avenue for release other then a serve all?

Whether a State or US Court of Appeals abused its discretion and/or committed plain error for a misapplication of state law (statute)