No. 23-6058
Liberty Anne Walden v. Jeremy Howard, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure due-process evidence expert-testimony judicial-error misconduct plain-error prosecutorial-misconduct trial-court-discretion trial-procedure witness-credibility
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Did the trial court plainly error by allowing Dr. Mohr to testify outside the realm of her expertise thereby providing testimony to the ultimate issue of fact?
II. Did the prosecutor commit misconduct by denying Defendant a fair trial by vouching for the witness's credibility?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court plainly error by allowing Dr. Mohr to testify outside the realm of her expertise thereby providing testimony to the ultimate issue of fact?
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent Jeremy Howard, Warden to respond filed.
2023-11-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2023)
Attorneys
Jeremy Howard, Warden
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Liberty Anne Walden
Liberty Anne Walden — Petitioner