No. 23-604
Tags: habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mental-illness mitigating-evidence prejudice-analysis strickland-standard strickland-v-washington williams-v-taylor
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Texas courts' prejudice analysis defies this Court's precedents in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 (2000); Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003); and their progeny where the habeas court found that trial counsel performed deficiently in failing to investigate and present available mitigating evidence of petitioner's mental illness—and lied to the trial court about his reasons for this omission—and where the jury assessed maximum sentences.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Texas courts' prejudice analysis defies this Court's precedents in Strickland v. Washington, Williams v. Taylor, and Wiggins v. Smith
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-12-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 5, 2024)
Attorneys
Leon Phillip Jacob
Josh Barrett Schaffer — Schaffer Law Offices, Petitioner