Because there is a split in the Circuits on the issue, should this Court instruct the lower courts to uniformly apply the law that, under United States v. Bagley , 473 U.S. 667 (1985) , and Giglio v. United States , 405 U.S. 150 (1972), a prosecutor must disclose an important prosecution witness's bias or interest when the prosecutor induces that witness to testify by holding out the hope of favorable treatment, even if the inducement does not take the form of an agreement with specific terms?

Whether prosecutors must disclose inducements provided to witnesses, even in the absence of an agreement with express terms