No. 23-6018
Calvin F. Currica v. Richard Miller, Warden
Tags: brady-standard brady-vs-maryland criminal-procedure due-process fourth-circuit guidelines judicial-review plea-agreement plea-bargaining post-conviction-review sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the decision below should be summarily reversed because the Fourth Circuit substituted its judgment for an erroneous factual decision by the state post-conviction review court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the decision below should be summarily reversed because the Fourth Circuit substituted its judgment for an erroneous factual decision by the state post-conviction review court
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-16
Waiver of right of respondent Miller, Warden to respond filed.
2023-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 15, 2023)
2023-08-14
Application (23A126) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 11, 2023.
2023-08-07
Application (23A126) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 12, 2023 to November 11, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Calvin Currica
Erica Joan Hashimoto — Georgetown University Law Center, Petitioner
Miller, Warden
Jeremy Hugh Welter — Maryland Office of the Attorney General, Respondent