The Court Should Grant A Review To Settle The Weather The California Courts Were Correct.

Question: In Stating That The Petitioner's Case Was Finally, Because His California Senate Bill - 1343 Tie-Sentenced Disposition Only Stated That His Sentence Was "Remanded Back To Superior Court And Not Vacated Back To Superior Court For "Re-Sentence Today," When The Criminal Procedures As A Whole Had Not Ended, Resulting The Petitioner Being Barred From Receiving Sentences From A Newly Enacted California Law, Senate Bill - 567; Violating The Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment Equal Clause "Right"?

This Court Should Grant A Review To The Important And "Recurring Question" The California Blocking To Violate/Resettle Of, Do The Courts Have The "Right" To Defendants Sixth Amendment Constitutional To Have A Jury And A Judge Determine Beyond A Reasonable Doubt In The Facts Supporting, And Upper Term Sentence.

Whether the California courts were correct in stating that the petitioner's case was final, because the California Senate Bill 1393 resentencing disposition only stated that his sentence was remanded back to superior court and not vacated