No. 23-5961

Martin Robinson v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission, et al.

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2023-11-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: accountability civil-procedure civil-rights court-accountability due-process judicial-misconduct jurisdictional-transfer pro-se-litigation public-officials standing
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Original Complaint in the Supreme Court of Ohio,
The right to an effective judicial process. Why are the courts ignoring my claims of
wrongful imprisonment?
Why have the corrupt acts, lying, stealing, fraud of public officials been allowed to carry
for the past years, without any investigation. Is there a lack of accountability? Where are the
people in the positions being paid to investigate these allegations? Why are the Justices that
being paid to be impartial, covering for public officials committing bad acts (criminal acts if
by a civilian)?on
are
Why does the S.C.O. intentionally mail inter-departmental decisions untimely in order to
onsideration? Why is it ignored when inmates haveprevent the timely filing of a ten day
repeatedly brought it to the courts attention?rec
How do I get this court to act? Who is filling in for Justice Clarence Thomas while he is
busy traveling lavishly all around the world? Is he the reason this court refuses to near my
cases?
In the Supreme Court of Ohio, ali of the attorneys for respondents did not sign the
answer which violated Civ.R.ll, failing to sign the complaint as required by Civ.R.ll.
Should the SCO have transferred jurisdiction to OH Court of Claims or U.S. District
Court? Or simply granted the complaint? The SCO failed to hold a hearing prior to dismissal of
the original action.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is there a lack of accountability for public officials' corrupt acts, lying, stealing, and fraud?

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2024-01-24
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-05
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2023-12-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent Ohio Civil Rights Commission, et al. to respond filed.
2023-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2023)

Attorneys

Martin Robinson
Martin Robinson — Petitioner
Ohio Civil Rights Commission, et al.
Michael Jason HendershotOhio Attorney General's Office, Respondent