No. 23-5947
Kraig M. Trotter v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: controlled-substances criminal-procedure deterrence due-process federal-sentencing methamphetamine methamphetamines proportional-punishment sentencing-guidelines third-circuit
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Third Circuit err in failing to consider the disparity in sentencing under U.S.S.G §2D1.1(c) of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for methamphetamines as opposed to other controlled substances?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Third Circuit err in failing to consider the disparity in sentencing under U.S.S.G §2D1.1(c) of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for methamphetamines as opposed to other controlled substances?
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 4, 2023)
Attorneys
Kraig Trotter
Kevin A Buchan — Buchan Palo & Cardamone LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent