No. 23-594

Christopher M. Hunt v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-review federal-court-jurisdiction federal-courts fraud judicial-review jurisdiction jurisdictional-conflict property-rights sovereignty state-court-sovereignty state-courts
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Conflict concerns the international sovereignty of the United States of America and sovereignty of all U.S. Courts effecting millions of homeowners: which court resolves an irreconcilable conflict of jurisdiction between the federal courts and state courts? Instant case: is a federal court to hold the mandate while investigating fraud and enforce its jurisdiction over state by disregarding its rule "not to disturb state orders" even when nullity and contemptuous to federal courts, or, does the state disregard its unconstitutional rule of no review of a superior court nullity and illegal supersedeas bond obtained by fraud on the courts and is in contempt of federal court jurisdiction?

2. How do federal courts properly enforce jurisdiction and close the legal loophole being premeditated-ly exploited by a white-collar criminal international company (Deutsche) operating illegally in the United States?

3. Is it constitutional for a state to have rule a lone judge can make a ruling that is not appealable or reviewable despite being nullity, illegal, contemptuous to federal courts orders and jurisdiction, violates state Constitution, and enables white-collar felony crime of stealing an entire home of 100% legally correct Homeowner with $500,000 equity?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Which court resolves an irreconcilable conflict of jurisdiction between the federal courts and state courts?

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-11-14

Attorneys

Christopher M. Hunt
Christopher M. Hunt Sr. — Petitioner