No. 23-5928
Michael David Beiter, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights court-appointed-counsel criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process initial-appearance judicial-procedure legal-representation magistrate-judge right-to-counsel
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Can a magistrate judge at an initial appearance force counsel upon a defendant who has never waived his rights and never participated in the right to constitute counsel? Defendant who will
2. Can a magistrate judge at initial appearance force counsel upon a defendant without U.S.C. 3006(a) (no notify)?
3. Can a magistrate judge at an initial appearance hearing force counsel upon a defendant who the first instance said counsel, and gradually beyond the court's attempt to force counsel upon a defendant?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a magistrate judge force counsel upon a defendant without consent?
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 1, 2023)
Attorneys
Michael David Beiter, Jr.
Michael David Beiter Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent