1. Whether reasonable jurists could debate whether controlling circuit
precedent precludes issuance of a certificate of appealability in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255
proceeding.

2. Whether a movant's procedural default may be excused because his
constitutional vagueness challenge was "not reasonably available" prior to Johnson
v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015).

3. Whether a general verdict that was obtained in reliance on the
unconstitutionally vague residual clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(8)(B) may be
sustained based on the reviewing court's finding that the jury also relied on a valid
basis to convict.

Whether reasonable jurists could debate whether controlling circuit precedent precludes issuance of a certificate of appealability