No. 23-5908
Michael James Choulat v. United States
Tags: which expands the application of § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) agency-deference criminal-law drug-trafficking firearm-possession firearms sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Kisor's limits on courts' deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulation permitted deference to Comment 14(B), which expands the application of § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Kisor's limits on courts' deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulation permitted deference to Comment 14(B), which expands the application of § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B)
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-12-29
Memorandum of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-11-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 29, 2023.
2023-11-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 29, 2023 to December 29, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2023)
Attorneys
Michael Choulat
Shane O'Neal — O'Neal Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent