1) A conflict exists between decisions recently ren
dered by two State Supreme Courts which affirm
injured voters have standing to be heard, and the
decisions rendered by the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in this
matter, and this must be resolved as this decision
is of National Importance as it prohibits not only
Petitioner 's right to vote, but every U.S. Citizen 's
right to vote.

2) A conflict exists between State and Federal Law
involving Petitioner 's Constitutional right to vote
and machines used in the United States not certi
fied per Federal HAVA law, which are stealing the
right of suffrage from not only the Petitioner, but
every U.S. Citizen, and Petitioner motions this
Court to settle the many conflicts which exist with
the States ' use of these uncertified, compromised
machines, including a) Should Petitioner and all
U.S. Citizens continue to be denied their Constitu
tional right to vote by being forced to use elec
tronic voting machines that have been and still
can be accessed and votes flipped, and b) should
Americans be forced to further endure the Amer-
ica-harming policies of a President and Vice Pres
ident treasonously and fraudulently installed with
a flip of these machines ' vote tallies in many
States in the 2020 election?

3) A conflict exists between law as issued by this
Court and in our Constitution and the failure of
Judges in the two lower courts in this matter to
act upon this law and their Oaths to uphold the
Constitution and hear these reports of treason and
overthrow of our country. These matters of derelic
tion of duty and failure to hear treasonous matters
reported to them must therefore be quickly re
solved as the security of our nation has been com
promised.

Whether injured voters have standing to challenge the use of uncertified voting machines that may have compromised the 2020 election